{"id":77,"date":"2016-02-09T14:07:43","date_gmt":"2016-02-09T14:07:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.enog.org\/enog-9\/?page_id=77"},"modified":"2016-06-01T09:03:21","modified_gmt":"2016-06-01T09:03:21","slug":"minutes","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/localhost.ripe.net\/enog-9\/meeting-report\/minutes\/","title":{"rendered":"Minutes"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
This presentation is available at: – Patrik F\u00e4ltstr\u00f6m, Netnod<\/p>\n This presentation is available at: – Jeff Tantsura, Ericsson<\/p>\n This presentation is available at: – Hans Petter Holen, RIPE Chair<\/p>\n This presentation is available at: Hans Petter presented on the history of RIPE and talked about the NTIA transition, explaining where the numbers community was in the process.<\/p>\n Dmitry Burkov, RIPE NCC Executive Board, asked what they expected they would do in the next few weeks.<\/p>\n Hans Petter replied that he expected they would complete the SLA, but it would depend on whether the names community could meet the deadline, which he thought was doubtful.<\/p>\n Sergey Myasodev asked what they would do if the names community couldn\u2019t submit an acceptable proposal within the time frame.<\/p>\n Hans Petter replied that if they couldn\u2019t make it in time, they would simply resubmit the proposal in few months or a year, however there was an election coming up in the United States and this might affect the process.<\/p>\n Dmitry said people would use all available means to influence the upcoming election. He said that a US politician had recently said that the US was still in Germany, so why would it withdraw its occupation of the Internet? He asked if they needed a single IANA and said he had previously suggested that IANA could be divided. He said the IETF had been reluctant on this in the past, but now even the SSAC was highlighting this as a risk. He said they were entering the period of big politics.<\/p>\n Hans Petter agreed and said that the politics weren\u2019t about IP addresses.<\/p>\n Axel Pawlik said there was always the possibility that the contract could be changed and those communities that had their proposals in on time could be let go a little bit earlier. He said there had been discussions that the NTIA contract could be extended only for the names component. He said that operationally the numbers community was happy, as IANA had served them well for 15 years. He said this was mostly about politics.<\/p>\n An audience member asked if the NRO was ready to be formalised from a bureaucratic point of view, as the running cost was less than half of one person.<\/p>\n Dmitry said he would like to add that the whole staff off IANA was just 12 people. He said mostly this was part time work that involved responding to enquiries and preparing documentation. He said this wasn\u2019t much much. He said the question of whether they should establish the NRO was caused by functions of IANA. He said if they decided they needed someone to fulfil that role, they could solve that quite quickly. He said currently they could do without any joint operation of registries. He said the question of jurisdiction was important everywhere, as was the question of risk. He said law enforcement had thought they would be able to identify everyone using IP addresses, but this illusion ended a few years ago.<\/p>\n – Peter Cladingbowl, IXcellerate<\/p>\n This presentation is available at: – Eugene Uskov, HLL LLC<\/p>\n This presentation is available at: – Anton Baskov, Alexey Semenyaka and Alexander Isavnin<\/p>\n This presentation is available at: – Alexey Semenyaka, Qrator Labs<\/p>\n This presentation is available at: <\/p>\n https:\/\/www.enog.org\/presentations\/enog-9\/37-RIPENCC_ENOG9_Technical_Services_final.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n Alexander Isavnin, Tech. S.A, asked if Kaveh could talk a little bit more about the new website, such as the advantages of the new design, and any further planned developments.<\/p>\n Kaveh replied that there had been a presentation dealing with this at RIPE 70 and this would be available in the archive on the meeting website. He said there was the issue that a lot of the older documentation on the website needed to be retained, but clearly marked as deprecated, while at the same time making it easier to navigate through. He said the website search had been greatly improved and the RIPE NCC had taken care to communicate regularly to the community throughout the process, including one Labs article three months before the launch, and another one month before. He said the new site was modern and was easier to use on mobile phones.<\/p>\n Alexander noted that the ENOG website was over five years old and asked if the RIPE NCC had any plans to develop this and provide the community with a new website.<\/p>\n Kaveh said he couldn\u2019t speak to that directly, but they were trying to support NOGs and he was sure they could do something more if the community wanted that. Kaveh said if they had feedback, they could give it to any RIPE NCC staff member and they would make sure it reached the right person. He said community feedback was very useful.<\/p>\n Dmirty Kohmanyuk, Hostmaster, said it would be helpful to have an article explaining how the new website that was visible from the front page of the website.<\/p>\n – Axel Pawlik, RIPE NCC<\/p>\n This presentation is available at: There were no questions.<\/p>\n – Michael Yakushev, ICANN<\/p>\n This presentation is available at: – Martin Semrad, NIX.CZ<\/p>\n This presentation is available at: – Alexander Ilin, MSK-IX<\/p>\n This presentation is available at: – Martin Eriksson, Netnod<\/p>\n This presentation is available at: Moderator:<\/strong> Elena Voronina, MSK-IX This presentation is available at: – Sergey Zubov, CDNvideo<\/p>\n This presentation is available at: – Dmitry Belyavsky, Technical Center of Internet (TCI)<\/p>\n This presentation is available at: – Evgeny Zobnitsev, Factor Group<\/p>\n This presentation is available at: – Pavel Odintsov, FastVPS Eesti OU<\/p>\n This presentation is available at: – Maxim Burtikov, RIPE NCC<\/p>\n This presentation is available at: Maxim Burtikov gave an Internet governance overview, and went over the status of the IANA transition.<\/p>\n An audience member asked about jurisdiction issues to do with ICANN and the SLA.<\/p>\n Maxim replied that the SLA was based on the current contract with ICANN so he didn\u2019t know what jurisdiction they would use. He said the current IANA operator was ICANN and noted they already had headquarters in Istanbul, Geneva and other places. He added that they would likely be based in the US.<\/p>\n Dimitri Kohmanyuk asked what would happen if they didn\u2019t meet the deadline.<\/p>\n Maxim said the NTIA already had the right to prolong the contract and after the upcoming ICANN meeting in Buenos Aires they would all understand what they were going to do.<\/p>\n Axel Pawlik said the NTIA had made it clear that it expected a community proposal that made them comfortable that the policy development and services would be done as they had been previously. He said the implementation on the number community\u2019s part would be about 30 days and then they would be done.<\/p>\n Maxim said this allowed them to be confident and look to the future. He said they had observed all the terms and conditions and they didn\u2019t see any threats that required them to hold up the process. He said in the event that they needed to implement a Plan B, it would not result in a catastrophe.<\/p>\n – Dmitry Belyavsky, Technical Center of Internet (TCI)<\/p>\n This presentation is available at: – Dmitry Rud, DDoS Guard<\/p>\n – Georgii Gritsai and Igor Milashevskiy, Open Net Association<\/p>\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.enog.org\/presentations\/enog-9\/26-enog-update.ppt<\/a><\/p>\nSSAC View on the IANA Transition<\/h5>\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.enog.org\/presentations\/enog-9\/21-SSAC_Activities_Update_ENOG-patrik.pdf<\/a><\/p>\nProgrammable, Programmable, Model Driven & Application Aware Multi-layer SDN with Segment Routing and OpenDayLight (ODL)<\/h5>\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.enog.org\/presentations\/enog-9\/10-Programmable,_Model_Driven_&_Application_Aware_Multi-layer_SDN_with_Segment_Routing_and_OpenDayLight_(ODL).pptx<\/a><\/p>\nPlenary, 17:00 \u2013 19:15<\/h4>\n
RIPE vs RIPE NCC: From the Beginning to After the NTIA Transition<\/h5>\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.enog.org\/presentations\/enog-9\/28-ENOG_9_-_RIPE_vs_RIPE_NCC_from_the_beginning_to_after_the_NTIA_transition.pdf<\/a><\/p>\nThe Internet User Experience in the Russian Federation<\/h5>\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.enog.org\/presentations\/enog-9\/16-ENOG9_Eurasia_Peering_ver_1.pptx<\/a><\/p>\nGlobal Routing Analysis in the Volga Region<\/h5>\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.enog.org\/presentations\/enog-9\/25-ENOG.pdf<\/a><\/p>\nBirds of a Feather<\/h4>\n
Working Groups at ENOG<\/h5>\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.enog.org\/presentations\/enog-9\/30-2015.06.09_-_ENOG_WG.pdf<\/a><\/p>\nLegal Aspects of IP Space Transitions in Russia<\/h5>\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.enog.org\/presentations\/enog-9\/27-20150609_ENOG.pptx<\/a><\/p>\nWednesday 10 June<\/h3>\n
Plenary, 10:00 \u2013 11:30<\/h4>\n
RIPE NCC Technical Services Update<\/h5>\n
RIPE NCC Report<\/h5>\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.enog.org\/presentations\/enog-9\/34-ENOG_9_-_RIPE_NCC_Update.pdf<\/a><\/p>\nNew gTLD Program: Results, Challenges, Perspectives<\/h5>\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.enog.org\/presentations\/enog-9\/38-Kazan_2015_June_ENOG.pptx<\/a><\/p>\nPlenary, 12:00 \u2013 13:30<\/h4>\n
NIX.CZ Development: a Broader View<\/h5>\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.enog.org\/presentations\/enog-9\/33-ENOG9.pptx<\/a><\/p>\nAdvances in Peering Technologies<\/h5>\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.enog.org\/presentations\/enog-9\/44-msk-ix-enog-9-kazan.pdf<\/a><\/p>\nNetnod Update<\/h5>\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.enog.org\/presentations\/enog-9\/36-Netnod_update_ENOG9_150610.key<\/a><\/p>\nPanel: The Many Faces of Distributed Peering and Russia\u2019s IXP Ecosystem<\/h5>\n
\nPanelists:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.enog.org\/presentations\/enog-9\/42-panel-IXP-ENOG9.pptx<\/a><\/p>\nPlenary, 15:00 \u2013 17:00<\/h4>\n
Comparison of Traffic Balancing Methods<\/h5>\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.enog.org\/presentations\/enog-9\/6-\u0412\u044b\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043d\u0438\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435_\u0442\u0440\u0430\u0444\u0438\u043a\u0430_\u0417\u0443\u0431\u043e\u0432.ppt<\/a><\/p>\nBlacklist Monitoring<\/h5>\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.enog.org\/presentations\/enog-9\/8-Blacklists_ENOG.pptx<\/a><\/p>\nFOSS in TELCOS<\/h5>\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.enog.org\/presentations\/enog-9\/15-FOSSinTelecom-ENOG9-v3.pdf<\/a><\/p>\nFastNetMon – Open Source Toolkit for DDoS Attack Mitigation<\/h5>\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.enog.org\/presentations\/enog-9\/17-FastNetMon_ENOG_pdf.pdf<\/a><\/p>\nClosing Plenary, 17:30 \u2013 18:30<\/h4>\n
Update on Internet Governance<\/h5>\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.enog.org\/presentations\/enog-9\/41-ENOG_9_-_Internet_Governance_Update.key<\/a><\/p>\nLightning Talks<\/h4>\n
Logjam: new dangers for secure protocols<\/h5>\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.enog.org\/presentations\/enog-9\/9-Logjam.pptx<\/a><\/p>\nBusiness Protection from Modern DoS Threats: Comparison Between IAAS and Hardware-Solutions<\/h5>\n
About the Open Net Association<\/h5>\n